5 Interesting Theories on World Creation

March 14, 2010 | Featured, Miscellaneous

For centuries, people have wondered how the world was created. We may never know how we came to be, but there are many different theories on the subject. From scientists to mathematicians to religious deities all have theories on how the world was created. What theory you choose to believe is up to you.

1. The Mayans

Image Source

According to the Mayans, there were two people, Tepeu and Gucumatz. They would sit around and think about things and then those things would exist. They thought up the mountains, the earth, the oceans, the sky and the animals and once they did they appeared. They used clay to create people, which would fall apart when they got wet, so they made people at of wood. These people would cause trouble so the God created a flood and wiped them out. They were allowed to start over. This is how the Earth became what it is today.

2. The Scandinavians

Image Source

According the Scandinavians, there was an emptiness that needed to be filled. There were two Gods, Muspell and Niflhiem. Muspell was the leader of the fiery realm and Niflhiem was the leader of the icy realm. They would plat in this vast open space. Inside the space the air grew mild and once the ice started to melt, Ymir was created. He was an evil God. While Ymir slept, he sweated and brought to life two males and a female frost giant. More ice melted in the time passed and a cow was created. She had plenty of milk to feed Ymir. She would nourish herself by licking the ice blocks. After a few days of licking the ice, she revealed a man who had a son. The son married one of the frost giant’s daughters and they had three sons, who killed Ymir. The blood that flowed from Ymir drowned all the frost giants except for Berglimir and his wife. They took the flesh and bones of Ymir and then created the Earth. While walking along the Earth’s surface Odin, one of the sons of the frost giant, spotted two logs and gave them life, while one of the other brothers gave them brains and feelings and the other gave them hearing and sight. From this man and women all life is created.

3. The Chinese

Image Source

Chinese believe that in the beginning heaven and Earth were as one. The universe was a big black egg that carried a God, Pan-Gu, inside itself. Pan Gu awoke from a 18 thousand year nap and wanted out of the egg. He took his broad axe and smashed through. The light became the heavens and the heavier parts became the Earth. Pan-Gu stood in between with his head touching the heavens and his feet firmly planted on the Earth. All three would grow at a rate of ten feet per day. After 18 thousand years everything stopped growing. After his passing, he breathe became the wind and the clouds. His voice is the thunder and his eyes became the sun and moon. The mountains were formed from his body and limbs and the rivers and oceans are made of his blood. The fertile soil is from his muscles and the roads are his veins. The flowers and trees are from his skin and body hair, where the stars are from his beard and hair. Pearls and jade are made from his marrow and his sweat is the rain and dew.

4. The Australians

Image Source

In Australia they believe that the earth was plain and bare in the beginning. There was no light, life or death. The sun, moon, stars and eternal ancestors all slept beneath the Earth. When the ancestors arose, they would walk the earth in human form, animal form, plant form or a combination of the forms. There were two people that formed out of nothing and upon their walks across the Earth’s surface they would come upon some half finished plants, animals and humans. They would then carve heads, bodies and limbs from bundles of plants. This is how people were formed amongst the Earth’s surface. After the work of human creation was finished the ancestors went back to sleep. They either went back under the Earth or they stayed here in the form of plants and animals. They left sacred trails, which can be seen in the forms watering holes, rocks and trees.

5. The Apache Indians

Image Source

They believed that in the beginning there was nothing. Suddenly, there was a thin disk with a man inside. After awaking from his nap he looked up and light appeared, looking down he created a sea of light, to the east he created the streaks of dawn and to the west the colorful streaks of dusk. After creating all the light, he wiped his hands together and then thrust them in a downward motion. A girl on a cloud appeared. He asked her where she was going and she did not answer. She asked him where he was from and he said from the east. She asked where the earth was and he asked where the sky was. He sang four times, which is the lucky number to the Apache Indians that he was thinking of what to create next. He flung his hands wide open and then appeared the sun God. He then dropped his hands and then a small boy appeared. All four Gods where now present and they all shook hands, mixing their sweat together and then he sang about making the Earth again four times. After rubbing his hands together, a brown ball appeared. He kicked it and it expanded, the girl kicked it and it did the same, the sun God and the boy both took turns and the ball continued to expand. He then told the wind to go inside and blow it up. The Creator had created more Gods to look over things on Earth. He had created workers to help with the building of Earth. Once he seen work was done, then he disappeared leaving the works to create the world’s population.

Author: Harmony Stalter — Copyrighted © roadtickle.com


More from Road Tickle
  • Someone

    I don’t know about the others, but the scandinavian part is so wrong it was phisically painful to read.

    • someone else

      Mayan is incorrect as well.

      • Judo Chop

        It’s all silly.

      • escalonax

        It’s not even a Mayan image.

        That image is from Aztecs.

  • Someone

    I don’t know about the others, but the scandinavian part is so wrong it was phisically painful to read.

    • someone else

      Mayan is incorrect as well.

      • Judo Chop

        It’s all silly.

      • escalonax

        It’s not even a Mayan image.

        That image is from Aztecs.

  • http://lynnbensonvoice.tripod.com/ Lynn

    I know what I think, however I don’t KNOW because I wasn’t there. It is interesting that if you contemplate there being one true answer to the beginning there could very well be some overlapping of stories and aural history that all first come from someone knowing and sharing.

  • http://lynnbensonvoice.tripod.com Lynn

    I know what I think, however I don’t KNOW because I wasn’t there. It is interesting that if you contemplate there being one true answer to the beginning there could very well be some overlapping of stories and aural history that all first come from someone knowing and sharing.

  • Marcus Uncehk

    Anyone who reads this, please understand that this person didn’t post any sources, has absolutely no Mathematical or Scientific background and blatantly says things with no real understanding of its meaning.

    BTW, a theory in religious or “everyday” terms is an idea. In Science a Theory is proven, observable science.

    Not hard to understand —> we came from billions of years of evolution.

    • JD

      We came from Evolution??
      There are 6 definitions of evolution:

      Cosmic
      Chemical
      Stellar
      Organic
      Macro
      (*)Micro (The only “observable” by science)
      *Micro evolution is the variations within a specie.

      Hence, the others are NOT part of science. (Hare not observable – When do you see Helium become Zinc, or a monkey become man? There’s still monkeys, & gorillas, & chimpanzee)

      If in Science a Theory is proven, humans deriving from evolution is still not proven. Meaning why evolution “theory” is still a “theory”.

      • TimR

        The religious, such as JD, who have probably not completed any science courses past high school biology, seem to very much enjoy stating parameters, rules and limitations of science. Your list is silly and meaningless. Was it generated by your pastor? There are observable aspects of evolution for each item on your, as well as for others not listed.

        One only shows his ignorance by using the phrase is ‘still a “theory.”’ Theories are not like bills waiting to be passed. They are not waiting to be proven. Theories are complex models of aspects of the natural world with large bodies of evidence to support them. A theory must be falsifiable (something religious doctrine does not allow for), but cannot be absolutely proven. This is taken as a weakness by the religious, when it is actually the great strength of science.

        As theories gain supporting evidence, they become more accepted be reasonable people. They are never proven. The theory of gravity is accepted but not proven. If new data falsifies a theory, it must be rethought or scraped (also something religious dogma does not allow.

        The theory of evolution probably has more evidence supporting it (and none refuting it) than any other idea in the history of the human race. Not ‘believing’ in evolution is equated with not ‘believing’ in rationality in general.

        If there were a god who did not want people to accept evolution, and he designed the earth is such a way that anyone actually looking at the evidence would have to accept. This god would have to be the biggest practical-joking jackass in the history of deities.

  • Marcus Uncehk

    Anyone who reads this, please understand that this person didn’t post any sources, has absolutely no Mathematical or Scientific background and blatantly says things with no real understanding of its meaning.

    BTW, a theory in religious or “everyday” terms is an idea. In Science a Theory is proven, observable science.

    Not hard to understand —> we came from billions of years of evolution.

    • JD

      We came from Evolution??
      There are 6 definitions of evolution:

      Cosmic
      Chemical
      Stellar
      Organic
      Macro
      (*)Micro (The only “observable” by science)
      *Micro evolution is the variations within a specie.

      Hence, the others are NOT part of science. (Hare not observable – When do you see Helium become Zinc, or a monkey become man? There’s still monkeys, & gorillas, & chimpanzee)

      If in Science a Theory is proven, humans deriving from evolution is still not proven. Meaning why evolution “theory” is still a “theory”.

      • TimR

        The religious, such as JD, who have probably not completed any science courses past high school biology, seem to very much enjoy stating parameters, rules and limitations of science. Your list is silly and meaningless. Was it generated by your pastor? There are observable aspects of evolution for each item on your, as well as for others not listed.

        One only shows his ignorance by using the phrase is ‘still a “theory.”’ Theories are not like bills waiting to be passed. They are not waiting to be proven. Theories are complex models of aspects of the natural world with large bodies of evidence to support them. A theory must be falsifiable (something religious doctrine does not allow for), but cannot be absolutely proven. This is taken as a weakness by the religious, when it is actually the great strength of science.

        As theories gain supporting evidence, they become more accepted be reasonable people. They are never proven. The theory of gravity is accepted but not proven. If new data falsifies a theory, it must be rethought or scraped (also something religious dogma does not allow.

        The theory of evolution probably has more evidence supporting it (and none refuting it) than any other idea in the history of the human race. Not ‘believing’ in evolution is equated with not ‘believing’ in rationality in general.

        If there were a god who did not want people to accept evolution, and he designed the earth is such a way that anyone actually looking at the evidence would have to accept. This god would have to be the biggest practical-joking jackass in the history of deities.

  • Dan

    This is both inaccurate and riddled with spelling/grammar errors. Why is this on Digg?

  • Dan

    This is both inaccurate and riddled with spelling/grammar errors. Why is this on Digg?

  • Athyna

    Stop looking at these stories through “today’s eyes”. These were believed back before the internet, before electricity, before Europeans came to the Americas. It’s a glimpse at what indigenous people believed, where they’re morals came from. It’s fascinating, it’s not physics for gods sakes.

  • Athyna

    Stop looking at these stories through “today’s eyes”. These were believed back before the internet, before electricity, before Europeans came to the Americas. It’s a glimpse at what indigenous people believed, where they’re morals came from. It’s fascinating, it’s not physics for gods sakes.

  • wikiBuddha

    For the details of the Scandinavian version, look up “The Poetic Edda”.

    The Rig Veda also details interesting creation stories (Brahman, Hindu).

    Buddhism (particularly the Lotus Sutra and Nichiren Daishonin) makes mention of “the Mystic Law, uncreated and eternal, of the Buddha of beginningless time (kuon-ganjo)”

    “Because we are speaking here of the Buddha eternally endowed with the three bodies, it is not a question of something attained for the first time at a certain time, or of something that was worked for. This is not the kind of Buddhahood that is adorned with the thirty-two features and eighty characteristics or that needs to be improved on in any way. Because this is the eternal and immutable Buddha in his original state, he exists just as he always has. This is what is meant by kuon.”

    Perhaps the only “uncreation” story I’ve heard of. I’m sure the creationists want that taught in science class, too.

  • wikiBuddha

    For the details of the Scandinavian version, look up “The Poetic Edda”.

    The Rig Veda also details interesting creation stories (Brahman, Hindu).

    Buddhism (particularly the Lotus Sutra and Nichiren Daishonin) makes mention of “the Mystic Law, uncreated and eternal, of the Buddha of beginningless time (kuon-ganjo)”

    “Because we are speaking here of the Buddha eternally endowed with the three bodies, it is not a question of something attained for the first time at a certain time, or of something that was worked for. This is not the kind of Buddhahood that is adorned with the thirty-two features and eighty characteristics or that needs to be improved on in any way. Because this is the eternal and immutable Buddha in his original state, he exists just as he always has. This is what is meant by kuon.”

    Perhaps the only “uncreation” story I’ve heard of. I’m sure the creationists want that taught in science class, too.

  • Peter

    Those are not theories, they are religious myths .
    Nice try creationist jerks ..

    • Tim

      Hey C’mon. Creationists aren’t all jerks. They are all morons. And, they tend to be jerks.

  • Peter

    Those are not theories, they are religious myths .
    Nice try creationist jerks ..

    • Tim

      Hey C’mon. Creationists aren’t all jerks. They are all morons. And, they tend to be jerks.

  • wikiBuddha

    Oh yeah, and check out the Hawaiian Kumulipo, where the world was formed from ooze (very evolutionarily).

    Most of the actual texts can be found at sacred-texts . com

  • wikiBuddha

    Oh yeah, and check out the Hawaiian Kumulipo, where the world was formed from ooze (very evolutionarily).

    Most of the actual texts can be found at sacred-texts . com

  • Pingback: John From Berkeley » links for 2010-03-16

  • Phil

    What about all those crazies who say the world was invented by a magical, bearded man in the sky? Surely that has to rank high on the insanity scale.

    • Aawc5

      I’m still wondering who decided which apes would become human.  Why didn’t all the apes become human?

  • Phil

    What about all those crazies who say the world was invented by a magical, bearded man in the sky? Surely that has to rank high on the insanity scale.

  • http://www.genealogylist.com/ Ronald

    When you search for ancestors, you find great friends!

  • http://www.genealogylist.com Ronald

    When you search for ancestors, you find great friends!

  • Pingback: Traducir RSS

  • http://www.adriaenbanckert.com Becker Thijs

    Great piece, nice pics.. :-)

  • Jdmdominates94

    yea, but think these were mostly barbaric cultures . i mean if you read the material you can obviously come to the conclusion that they all were. this site is to inform you about what completely diverse cultures opinions and their beliefs about how our  earth was created. so apart from their different beliefs i try to look at the similarites betyween them. which is they all believe that a higher being formed our world. so know matter how ludacris their statements sound thats what they beileve. in 3000 years into the future im sure they are going to say the exact same thing about our modern beliefs know matter how saphfisticated our technology and science are today. so before you think theyre all absurd theories think about their time frame. and when the last time you tried to figure out how our entire world came to be and see what idotic idea you come up with.

  • Hoodlemm

    the mayan one is incorrect and there are alot of other better myths.

  • COKEET 41

    GOD

  • Pingback: World creation | Jlaura

Gallery Of The Day
Subscribe to ROAD TICKLE by Email
Advertisement
Most viewed in last 7 days
Most commented in last 7 days
    • None found
Road Tickle on More Cool Stuff
Our Friends
Fun / Advertisement
September 14, 2010

Most people associate college or university with the pursuit of certain …

September 11, 2010

When video games were first born and introduced to the public, …

Total Awesomeness
DON'T STOP!